About Me
- Judy Chaffee
- This site is the inspiration of a former reporter/photographer for one of New England's largest daily newspapers and for various magazines.
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Immigration enforcement program to be shut down -- By Alan Gomez, USA Today
WASHINGTON – The Obama administration is starting to
shut down a program that deputized local police officers to act as immigration
agents.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have trained
local officers around the country to act as their agencies' immigration
officers. Working either in jails or in the field, the officers can check the
immigration status of suspects and place immigration holds on them.
The program, known as 287(g), reached its peak under President
George W. Bush, when 60 local agencies signed contracts with ICE to
implement it. But that trend slowed significantly under President
Obama— only eight agencies have signed up since he took office, and none has
done so since August 2010.
Now, in their proposed budget for the upcoming year, Department
of Homeland Security officials say they will not sign new contracts for
287(g) officers working in the field and will terminate the "least productive"
of those agreements — saving an estimated $17 million. All the contracts between
ICE and local police agencies run for three years, so that portion of the
program could be finished by November when the last contract for field officers
expires.
In its budget request, DHS said officials instead will
focus on expanding Secure Communities, a program that checks the fingerprints of
all people booked into local jails against federal immigration databases. The
followup work in those cases is done by ICE agents, not local police.
"The Secure Communities screening process is more
consistent, efficient and cost-effective in identifying and removing criminal
and other priority aliens," the department explained in its budget request.
The program had been criticized by Homeland Security
inspector general reports, which found that local officers were not being
properly trained and there was not enough oversight to ensure that local
agencies weren't using the program to engage in racial profiling.
A study last year by the Migration
Policy Institute, a non-partisan think tank, found that immigrants developed
"fear and mistrust of authorities" when they realized that local police could
act as immigration agents.
The main complaint Friday from groups that oppose 287(g)
was that the program isn't being terminated immediately, and that its
replacement — Secure Communities — is not much better.
"The 287(g) program has been repeatedly called into
question by advocates as well as the Department of Homeland Security's inspector
general, and should be terminated rather than sustained with taxpayer money,"
said Ali Noorani, executive director of the National
Immigration Forum. "The Secure Communities program is surrounded by grave
concerns about the impact to public safety, community policing and civil rights
abuses."
Defenders of the program, such as Jessica Vaughan of the
Center for Immigration Studies, say Homeland Security is "putting politics ahead
of public safety" by cutting back the 287(g) program. She said Secure
Communities is helpful but that local officers working in the field are better
able to identify illegal immigrants who may not have their fingerprints in
federal databases, making it harder to identify them.
She said some agencies such as the Colorado Department of
Public Safety have used their 287(g) officers to suppress drug and human
smuggling, gang activity and identity theft and said many sheriffs and police
chiefs prefer the program to Secure Communities.
"The problem for ICE is that while they may feel that they
get political brownie points for this kind of gesture, in reality what the
anti-enforcement groups want is for them to end 287(g) and Secure Communities,
not curtail (them)," said Vaughan, director of policy studies for the center.
"So it's futile — they end up making everyone on both sides angry."
CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE
Sphere: Related Content
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)











































































0 comments:
Post a Comment