(Illustration by Linas Garsys, The Washington Times)
Killing incentive to give will hurt the poor, not the rich
Afundamental misunderstanding of the Robin Hood legend in the current
discussion of tax policy undergirds a mistaken idea, too rarely evaluated — that
hurting the “rich” helps the “poor.” Right now, this is played out in proposals
to reduce tax deductions for charitable giving.
Government-spending advocates argue that they should be able to seize more
funds from the wealthy by limiting deductions for nonprofit giving. The “rich”
will hand over their money to the government in higher taxes and continue to
give charitably, and the “poor” will receive largesse from both.
This strained reading of Robin Hood makes several very flawed assumptions,
including the idea that government is an effective source of help for the poor
and that wealth builders deserve to be penalized. In fact, the Robin Hood of
legend took back from tax collectors the money seized from the poor and returned
it — a medieval tax refund. The heroic act was helping people keep their own
money, unjustly seized by the ruling class who did not use those resources to
help the needy.
When it comes to real help, just who is most effective? This is the deeper
question begging an honest answer.
(Click link below to read more)
Sphere: Related Content
- Judy Chaffee
- This site is the inspiration of a former reporter/photographer for one of New England's largest daily newspapers and for various magazines. The intent is to direct readers to interesting political articles, and we urge you to visit the source sites. Any comments may be noted on site or directed to KarisChaf at gmail.