A proposal to raise various government fees to offset
sequester-driven budget cuts is at the heart of a pending congressional
budget deal, though some are warning lawmakers that higher fees is
another way of saying tax increase.
It's highly unlikely that the new revenue raised under the deal will
be described as a tax increase by the top two officials at the
bargaining table, Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., and Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis.
But higher fees would generate as much as $65 billion to replace the
unpopular cuts in military and domestic spending mandated under the
budget-trimming sequester. Those cuts are set to take effect in
mid-January.
Details of the fee hikes remain under wraps, but lawmakers have
considered increasing fees on airline tickets and new mortgages, raising
insurance premiums for pension funds and requiring federal civilian
employees to contribute more toward their retirement.
"It's basically the same thing as a tax increase," said Dan Holler,
spokesman for Heritage Action, an arm of the conservative Heritage
Foundation.
Affected trade groups agree, and have appealed to lawmakers to reject
fee increases, which they say are being used too recently to supplement
the general budget.
The airline industry is among those opposed to the Ryan-Murray deal,
which would double the security tax passengers now pay for the
Transportation Security Administration. The fee would rise to $5 per
passenger, which the airline lobby said would add $1.2 trillion annually
to the cost of air travel.
(Click link below to read more)
READ MORE
Sphere: Related Content
About Me

- Judy Chaffee
- This site is the inspiration of a former reporter/photographer for one of New England's largest daily newspapers and for various magazines. The intent is to direct readers to interesting political articles, and we urge you to visit the source sites. Any comments may be noted on site or directed to KarisChaf at gmail.
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment