Dud Con II: Immigration reform watchers have been waiting to see how the GOP leadership tries to
package legislation to trick anti-amnesty conservatives into voting for what in essence is an amnesty.** Curiosity grew after
House
Judiciary chair Bob Goodlatte
gave the impression
that the leaders were preparing some sort of “enforcement first”
approach — or at least preparing to pretend they were proposing an
“enforcement first” approach:
“If we can have a way to get [immigration enforcement] up and operating, I see no reason why we can’t also have an agreement that shows how people who are not lawfully here can be able to be lawfully here.” [E.A.]
The problem for Republican lobbyists–whose clients would deeply
appreciate the surge of cheap labor an immigration bill could provide–is
that Democrats will not agree to any bill that actually requires
enforcement measures (like an E-verify employment-check, or a system to
catch visa overstayers, or a fence) to be “up and operating” before
legalization. They want legalization
now – both to please their
constituents and to allow them leverage against enforcement later, once
legalization has been pocketed. (Yes, they offer some other policy
rationales. These
fall apart on inspection.)
So how were Boehner & Co going to sell “legal status first” plan as an “enforcement first plan”?
Now we know: By pretending that legal status isn’t legal status. That’s something that not even the
famously deceptive Senate Gang of 8 tried.
According to amnesty
champion
Paul Ryan, illegal immigrants would at first get “probationary status”
along with a “work permit.” They could come ‘out of the shadows’ and
live and work here. Then if measures are taken so the “border is
secured” they’d get a “regular work permit.”
The idea,
WaPo‘s
Greg Sargent says, seems to be that “Undocumenteds will be allowed
to work on probation while the border is being secured, but will not enjoy
legal status.” Why not? Apparently because their “probationary” permits might not be permanent — the immigrants “could be
kicked off of probationary status if certain security benchmarks aren’t met.”
(Click link below to read more)
READ MORE
Sphere: Related Content
No comments:
Post a Comment