
Congress can override the president's decision to hand over control of Web addresses and domains to an international body.
It's been a good month for
Vladimir Putin
: He got Crimea and the Internet.
Gallows
humor is not the only possible response to the
Obama
administration plan to give up U.S. control of the Internet to a
still-to-be-determined collection of governments and international
groups. Congress should instruct President Obama that if the Internet
ain't broke, don't fix it.
Authoritarian
governments led by Russia and China long ago found ways to block access
to the Internet for their citizens. Under the new Obama plan, these
regimes could also block access to the Internet for Americans.
There
is recent precedent: Authoritarian governments tried to block new
Internet top-level domains beyond the familiar .com and .org and .net.
Saudi Arabia sought to veto the addition of .gay as being "offensive."
It also tried to block .bible, .islam and .wine. Under U.S. control, the
Saudis were denied their wishes. With some new post-U.S. system of
governance, will .gay websites be removed from the Internet?
READ MORE
Sphere: Related Content
The plan announced on March 14 would have
the U.S. give up control of the "root zone file" of the Internet and the
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or Icann. This
root of the Internet stores all the names and addresses for websites
world-wide, while Icann controls Web addresses and domains. The U.S. has
used this control to ensure that websites operate without political
interference from any country and that anyone can start a website,
organize on Facebook or post on Twitter without asking permission.
It's
easy to imagine a new Internet oversight body operating like the United
Nations, with repressive governments taking turns silencing critics.
China could get its wish to remove FreeTibet.org from the Internet as an
affront to its sovereignty. Russia could force Twitter to remove posts
by Ukrainian-Americans criticizing Vladimir Putin.
(Click link below to read more) READ MORE
No comments:
Post a Comment